Jun 23, 2021 · I just purchased the Fuji 16-80 f4 lens despite numerous reviews stating pretty poor corners sharpness. However, I've been wanting a lens with this range for a while when traveling and I was ready to accept the compromises. I use it on a Fuji X-S10 camera body. Jan 21, 2016 · I like the f2.8 constant on the 17-55 but the weight difference is quite a bit - 17 oz vs 23 0z for the 17-55. On the other hand, I really enjoy, and need the 16mm. The range of 16-80 seems to also fit me better. Your call. Sorry for the confusion. Tests also seem to indicate better flare resistance for the 16-80. Nov 19, 2019 · Shop price of the kit was 1749 euros (VAT included, not taking the 200 Euros cashback, so 1549 after cashback, VAT in). In a regular shop (not de-kitted or grey market), the price of the 18-55 is also very high as compared with the kit price. Both lenses are meant to be sold in kit : the 18-55 with a XT30 and the 16-80 with the XT3. What is the difference between Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-80mm F2.8-4E ED VR and Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking. Jan 30, 2020 · The Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS is a fast standard zoom lens for Fujifilm X-series compact system cameras. Offering a focal range of 27-84mm in 35mm terms, 4 stops of built-in image stabilisation, a compact and lightweight design, 0.1 second auto-focusing and an aperture ring, is the Fujifilm XF 18-55mm F2.8-4 R LM OIS a viable Don’t have experience with the 15-45, but I started with the XC 16-50 before selling and getting the XF 18-55. The 16-50 has comparable image quality to the 18-55, which says a lot. It’s a fine lens. Thank you. I really appricate it. Buy a used Xf18-55. Since its the kit lens there are a lot of them floating around for pretty cheap. While the Sony 16-80mm offers slightly more reach, it does so by offering a variable aperture; some people will value the constant ƒ 2.8 aperture of the 16-50mm. The 16-50mm offers slightly sharper performance in some focal lengths, the 16-80mm is sharper in others, but the performance of the 16-50mm is probably more consistent overall. Nov 2, 2018 · Fujinon XF16-80mmF4 Vs Fujinon Zooms. After my recent Fujinon XF33mmF1.0 vs XF35mmF1.4 vs XF35mmF2 comparison, readers asked me if I can compare the size of the Fujinon XF 16-80mmF4 with the XF18-55mmF2.8-4 and XF16-55mmF2.8. You ask, I deliver ;). And based on this comparison, the XF16-80mmF4 looks like a fantastic travel lens! May 14, 2020 · Similar to the question about the 18-55 vs the 18-135, I'm wondering about whether it would be worth upgrading from 18-135 to the 16-80. I do enjoy the convenience of one zoom lens while hiking and traveling. The constant f/4 would be nice, although they both seem to share problems with corner softness. Jul 7, 2022 · The 50-140 outperforms at it’s minimum aperture over the 55-200. (EX: 50-140 F2.8 outperforms 55-200 F3.5) The 50-140 is clinically sharp by F3.6. The 55-200 is VERY sharp at all focal lengths around F8. The 55-200 performs adequately for a lens that can be purchased for $450 used. AcjbAO5.